PREFACE
The initial impetus
for this account of the international activities of the University of
Kansas came in 1993 from George Woodyard, then the dean of international
programs and studies of the university. He suggested that, because I had
been personally involved in many of KU’s early ventures in international
education and had continued these interests of mine beyond the years (1957-1972)
when I served in a succession of administrative roles in the university,
I should prepare a narrative of the university’s involvement in
international programs. He knew that I had been compiling some recollections
of my years at the university and that, included in these fragments, were
some pages dealing with some of KU’s ventures in the international
field. Thus I was in a poor position to contradict his assertion that
I might, quite possibly, be able to write the story without having to
research it “from scratch.”
My acceptance was, however, qualified. I did not want this to be a tale
of my involvement. On the contrary, I wanted to relate what the university
had done, how KU came to do what it had done, and who all had contributed.
I would, in other words, attempt to produce a record of University of
Kansas achievement, without, however, glossing over failures and shortcomings.
My method would be to examine as many documents as I could find and talk
to as many participants as were still available.
But I still faced the issue of what I ought to do with those parts of
the story in which I myself had played a part. Even as I look over these
opening paragraphs I am struck by the fact that the word “I”
appears ten times in two paragraphs. The prospect of a publication purporting
to be the story of an institution’s activities, yet punctured throughout
by the word “I”, holds no appeal for me. But I am certainly
no Julius Caesar and writing in the third person strikes me often as contrived,
even arrogant. Thus I will try to keep the “I”‘s to
a minimum but will use the first person where that is the appropriate
way to tell the story.
One other constraint I faced was whether this account should include activities
originating at or related to the Medical Center and the schools located
there or, by analogy, at the Regents Center in Johnson County or the Medical
School’s Wichita branch or the Capital Center in Topeka. (Some of
these parts of the University of Kansas did not even exist fifty or twenty
years ago; all of them now enjoy degrees of autonomy—which has not
always been the same.) Medical schools are, for good reasons, grounded
in the nature of the profession, different from liberal arts colleges
or engineering schools. Academic work offered to persons holding full-time
jobs has to take account of the fact that most of these students can pursue
their educational objectives at only one site, that nearest to their habitat.
This account will therefore be confined to events and activities on the
original core part of the university, the Lawrence campus.
Several years elapsed after George Woodyard’s suggestion as other
commitments delayed my compliance with the assignment he had entrusted
to me. During the subsequent tenure of Andrew Debicki as dean of international
programs it appeared that a graduate student at the University of Missouri
at Kansas City might take on the task as his doctoral thesis. I took this
man to lunch, gave him a fairly extensive oral introduction to the topic
and provided him with copies of materials in my personal files. Unfortunately
the student’s plans had to be changed before he could even start
on a thesis. Thus when Diana Carlin, newly named to the deanship of international
programs, inquired about the program’s past, she learned that the
information was widely scattered. She also learned that George Woodyard
had hoped that I would eventually prepare an account of KU’s international
programs and that Andrew Debicki would have done likewise, if it had not
been for the appearance of the UMKC doctoral student. Dean Carlin then
urged me to undertake the task, and Provost David Shulenburger provided
initial support. To all and each of them, my thanks for the opportunity.
Specific thanks are also due to William Crowe, librarian extraordinaire,
who made it possible for me to devote much of the year 2002 enmeshed in
the University Archives in the Spencer Research Library (over which he
presides), and to Ned Kehde and Barry Bunch, whose knowledge of what is
to be found in the archives goes far beyond the portion of the archives’
contents that the two of them, the entire full-time staff of the unit,
have been able to inventory and index.
Because the University Archives continue to be a project in the making,
I have not routinely included references to specific record groups and/or
files in the archives; they appear only where they seemed to be needed.
Other footnote references are used only to document the use of language
used by other authors or to enlarge upon the text where this appeared
to be necessary or desirable. Any textual statements not accompanied by
a footnote should be assumed to be drawn from the University Archives
or, if the text indicated my own involvement, my personal recollection.
I learned in the course of my visits to the University Archives that most
things I had in my personal files were also to be found in some of the
many boxes on the top floor of the Spencer Research Library.
In a few instances words or phrases appear in a language other than English.
Where this is the case, the foreign expression is italicized and the English
translation follows in parentheses. In the case of proper names that appear
in Spanish showing both parents’ family names, I have rendered them
in that manner at the first mention of a person but have omitted the maternal
name at subsequent mentions.
A great many people talked to me as I was writing this story, including
many who were (and many who are) part of the continuing story. I shall
not attempt to list them all by name, mainly because I fear that any such
list would be incomplete. To those who feel that I should have sought
their personal account, I offer my assurance that no slight was intended;
my perusal of the documentary information made me feel comfortable enough
for the limited purposes of this account.
Inevitably, the documentation I have consulted is uneven and many of the
players are no longer available. In a few instances the international
facets of a project appeared to be secondary in nature; in a few other
instances the available information was too meager to indicate whether
the project had even gotten off the ground. Thus this account does not
purport to be an all-inclusive inventory.
Lastly I wish to single out three persons—now all deceased—because
there would be no story without them and, perhaps less importantly, because
without them I would never have been a part of the story. In alphabetical
order they are: J.A. (Toni) Burzle, indefatigable advocate of educational
exchange, generous to the university both in service and substance; Franklin
D. Murphy, a man of exceptional vision and capacity, towering among past
chancellors; and George R. Waggoner, broad-gauged scholar, inspired and
inspirational educational leader, and one of the best friends I ever had.
To their memory this story of the international programs of the University
of Kansas is fondly and respectfully dedicated.
~return~
|